Image

Zentrum (Lynne), 2011. Painted steel mobile. Courtesy Dorit Margreiter, Krobath Vienna/Berlin, Stampa; Basel. Photo Jaoquim Cortes and Roman Lores.

‘For Dorit Margreiter questions pertaining to the preservation or, conversely, the destruction of late Modernist architecture provide the occasion for probing larger issues shaping our contemporary socio-cultural context. Comprised of a carefully calibrated selection of works made over the past seven years, “Description”, her first major survey show, highlights an abiding preoccupation. Four installations involving projected film are accompanied by ancillary related works. A nexus of interrelated pieces titled “zentrum”, (2004 and ongoing), is located like a hinge at the juncture of the exhibition’s two principal axes. Tellingly, “zentrum” has also provided the point of departure for the quartet of new works dispersed throughout the galleries. Monumental metal mobiles, these sculptures reference text-based works installed in adjacent spaces in that they, too, are comprised of letters from an alphabet created by the artist; when they are considered as moving images, however, their closest affinities are with her film projections.

Not polemic but description was the rhetorical mode Margreiter chose when conceiving this exhibition. Her disarmingly restrained timbre is nonetheless inflected with an incisive gender politics that has variously informed her practice over the past decade. Here it is perhaps most evident in the conjunction of subjects that fall loosely under the rubric of architecture: housing (both public and private), space (domestic and social), interiors (psychic and physical), display and exhibition. The theoretical and practical conundrums intrinsic to the preservation/destruction dialectic as outlined by Koolhaas are restated in “Description”. Clearly at issue in this ensemble of works, they are not, however, articulated as binary alternatives: rather, they are presented as fundamentally incongruent. Margreiter thereby opens up alternative ways of conceptualizing such questions. Key, for her, are the forms in which they are represented and, consequently, the terms in which their discursive field is mapped. Seeking neither to theorize nor historicize the problematic of preservation/destruction, she offers instead models that can serve as heuristic devices—as ways of unpacking—socio-cultural representations which shape and govern the built environment.’

For more information about the artist and futher works http://www.doritmargreiter.net/

Text reproduced from http://www.domusweb.it/en/news/dorit-margreiter/

The karaoke queen from Japan creates a noise, a sensation, an idea. Autonomous fingers move hungrily to recall the performance again and again. Sipping Margarita’s occupying horizontal spaces and derelict floors.

Image reproduced from Human Anatomy for Art Students, S. Tresilian & H.J Williams, 1962: pp90

‘Everything that surrounds us becomes part of us, it seeps into us with every experience of the flesh and of life and, like the web of the great spider, binds us subtly to what is near, ensnares us in a fragile cradle of slow death, where we lie rocking in the wind. Everything in us and we are everything, but what is the point if everything is nothing? A ray of sun, a cloud whose own sudden shadow warns us of its coming, a breeze getting up, the silence that follows when it drops, certain faces, some voices, the easy smiles, as they talk, and then the night into which emerge, meaningless, the broken hieroglyphs of the stars.’

Fernando Pessoa, The Book of Disquiet, 2010:pp11

Image reproduced from http://portugal.poetryinternationalweb.org/piw_cms/cms/cms_module/index.php?obj_id=7051

Logout2?hl=en&service=mail&ilo=1&ils=wise%2Cwriterly%2C.

GB&ilc=0& continue=https%3A%2 %2Fwww.google.com%2

Faccounts%2FServiceLogin%3Fservice%3Dmail%26passive%3

Dtrue%26rm%3Dfalse%26continue%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252

Fmail.google.com%252Fmail%252F%253Fui%253Dhtml%2526zy%

253Dl%26bsv%3D llya [My God is he] 694le36z%26ss%3

D1 694le36z%26ss%3D1 %3D2%26hl%3Den%26from%3

Dlogout&zx=292773619,

‘A word may give me its meaning, but first it suppresses it. For me to be able to say,
‘This woman’ I must somehow take her flesh and blood reality away from her,
cause her to be absent, annihilate her. The word gives me the being, but it gives it
to me deprived of being. The word is the absence of that being, its nothingness,
what is left of it when it has lost being – the very fact that it does not exist.”

Blanchot, The Gaze of the Orpheus: pp41-42

Text reproduced from pdf of Rachel Louis Clapham’s Study Room Guide in In (W)reading Performance Writing, Image reproduced from http://www.mauriceblanchot.net/blog/

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.